Reading the social life of a design, before it is built

You cannot walk a building you have not yet built. Our agents can.

A design is a chain of decisions that cannot be taken back, and each is defended with intuition. We place cognitive agents inside the BIM model and let them live there — in workplaces, schools, hospitals, mixed-use buildings, wherever several groups have to share one floor.

Run M1 · Paper 1 result data · unedited output
Inhabitants

Cognitive agents that perceive, remember and form impressions of a place

Behaviour

No scripts or fixed routines — each acts on its own disposition, uninterrupted

Environment

Derived from the architect's own BIM (IFC) model

Footage

Unedited simulation output, replayable in full

Plate 01
A full day, inhabited — thirty-six agents, one continuous run, their paths drawn as they are walked. Unedited output.
§ IThe problem

An irreversible decision is taken every week of a design. Today it is defended with precedent and intuition. Cognitive Inhabitation puts a measurement in that place — the social life each alternative would invite, read before ground is broken.

§ IIHow a reading is made

A wind tunnel for human behaviour.

Stage

The BIM (IFC) model becomes the world agents inhabit — walls, rooms, stairs, sightlines — without redrawing.

Inhabit

Cognitive agents with memory, reflection and planning live there for days. No scripts — the behaviour emerges.

Evidence

Every gathering and every encounter is logged and replayable — a measurable property of the design, before ground is broken.

The reading is at its most useful where several groups have to share one building — a workplace, a school, a hospital, a mixed-use complex. What we measure is not headcount but who ends up meeting whom, and where.

§ IIIFindings, not features

Two plans, one brief. Two full days, inhabited.

All replays →
Where people gather/Where they talk/Where they linger/Which rooms go unused
A / BCorridor type vs cluster type · one full day each · separate runs

What differs is where people gather, where they talk, where they linger. Nothing here is choreographed. The two panels are separate runs; each source and engine generation is printed under the frame.

×11.5
Spontaneous lounge activation, B over A
First-generation engine · controlled re-run pending
Finding · social mixing
Conversations plotted on the plan, ground floor beside upper floor

Shared space dissolves boundaries.

Every conversation of one day, placed where it happened. Downstairs, in the commons, most talk crosses year groups. Upstairs, on the same day with the same children, almost none of it does.

Finding · unused rooms
Time spent in each room of the classroom floor

A plan always has rooms nobody chooses.

The classroom floor shaded by how long each room was actually occupied. Rooms left uncoloured recorded no use at all across the whole day.

Finding · what an encounter is made of

An encounter has contents, and they can be read.

Four conversations from one day on the classroom floor, each placed on the plan where it happened. Under them, faintly, is the day's movement — routed on the walkable grid, so no line crosses a wall. The dialogue is what the agents actually said to one another: unedited output, translated only.

A run can also be laid back over the plan — where the talking happened, who stayed and for how long, which routes wore in. See the figures on Research →

§ IVWhat we publish

The evidence is open. Every replay on this site is unedited simulation output, and the concept, the method and the verification results are published as papers.

Published

Paper 1 is submitted to the Architectural Institute of Korea 2026 Autumn Conference. The abstract and the three-seed research data are on the paper page; the full text follows the proceedings.

Verified

Every result is checked in three passes — ranking, distribution, then response to a controlled intervention — before it is called a finding.

Checkable

You do not have to take the verification on trust: the replays on this site are the runs the findings were read from. More on Method →

Bring us the model you are still deciding on.
Paper 1 — submitted to AIK Autumn Conference 2026 · research data open
Request an analysis